the Wakefield Doctrine

the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers

while ‘a dead balloon is a dead balloon’, the quality that gives life to the (non-dead) balloons is imperishable and therefore hold(s) out hope to all balloons

with 11 comments

…it has been said that “out of the mouths of babes come words of wisdom“, but then it has also been said “in mind of the child (is) the world as it should be and can never be

This Post is intended to be neither wise nor insightful, instead the hope is to be a little amusing with a sightly wry note (and just a hint of profundity).

The inventor of the rubber balloon, (the most common balloon) was Michael Faraday in 1824, via experiments with various gases.

 ‘the space within’

We put thirty spokes together and call it a wheel;
But it is on the space where there is nothing that the usefulness of the wheel depends.
We turn clay to make a vessel;
But it is on the space where there is nothing that the usefulness of the vessel depends.
We pierce doors and windows to make a house;
And it is on these spaces where there is nothing that the usefulness of the house depends.
Therefore just as we take advantage of what is, we should recognize the usefulness of what is not.

Holy shit! Yes, you really are reading a Post that is submitted as an entry to a Contest that is defined as ‘..a Post-writing Contest with the phrase ‘a dead balloon is a dead balloon’ in the Title, otherwise the Post can be on any topic or explore any subject, no limits on length or brevity’.
OK….and yet, you are still staring at a Post that has:

  • a totally fabricated ‘old saying’ ( the thing about …in the minds of )
  • a Wikipedia* definition of balloons
  • a Chinese ideogram that is being presented as the ‘word’ for ‘the space within’
  • * yeah, clarks react to Wikipedia the way that scotts react to ‘totally, guaranteed consequence-less sex’ and rogers respond to “just a small group of you friends and co-workers would like to present you with an award, that is, if you don’t mind”
  • what I am afraid is a photo of Michael Faraday ( being a clark, we won’t go totally out on the limb and do anything more than post the photo and know that it has a connection)…somewhere…we really hope
So, what does this entry to the Post-writing Contest give you in the way of insight into the world of a clark?
Unfortunately very little useable information. Which is ironic, as ‘information’ is the medium of the reality of clarks.
But maybe that is an answer.
It is said that clarks are always relating to the world in terms of ‘why’ and ‘to what end’, and it is also totally true that clarks view the world ( and the people and everything else) as being ‘there’, while they (the clark) are ‘here’.
Hey, lets get all ‘Miller Analogy Test’ (MAT) on this:
A ‘dead balloon’ is to a ‘live ballon’ as clarks are to scotts and rogers.
…this is not a negative, deprecatory characterization.
The world, as experienced by scotts and rogers is a place of action and interrelations; the world for most people is ‘give and take’, all experienced in real-time… ‘I touch you and you sigh’… ‘I hear your voice and feel hungry’  you know,  the world of Life**.
In this context of this discussion, while technically,  the opposite of life may be death, here we are using the word ‘death’ to try and imply that context that permits life to exist….the space within and between
clarks experience the world/Life from the perspective of  (that) space within,  but all too often we do so with our eyes/ears closed.
we encounter people, we feel the brush of emotions as we glance off a person’s death we even change the paths of the lives of the people in this space,  that clarks exist in…but we have our eyes closed.
** you are totally correct, only clarks feel that capitalizing the ‘L’ in the word life conveys additional meaning…lol
Advertisements

Written by clarkscottroger

April 13, 2012 at 7:59 am

11 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] while, ‘a dead balloon is a dead balloon’ the quality that gives life to the (non-dead) … […]

    • No mistaking the mindful clark-like post. As we all know those Clark’s minds are always full. That’s a hell of a lot of helium!

      Jennifer Wilson

      April 13, 2012 at 7:48 pm

  2. I would expect nothing less “mindful” from a clark. We all know that their minds are always full of a gazillion things all of the time.

    Jennifer Wilson

    April 13, 2012 at 10:02 am

  3. There is nothing more pleasant than reading something so much expected and yet rather unexpected ^_^ I enjoyed every bit of it and loved the after-thoughts that I got from this read. Thanks so much.

    Clairepeek

    April 16, 2012 at 5:15 am

    • …thank you Claire! yeah, it’s those un-expected ‘pre’ echos!!* Looking forward to the awarding of the DVD

      *pre-echo listen to the first Led Zepplin album they create an effect on a couple of songs of the guitar line being heard in the background, ‘in advance’ of it coming through ‘the front’ or something like that.

      clarkscottroger

      April 16, 2012 at 9:11 am

  4. “Faraday ultimately became the first and foremost Fullerian Professor of Chemistry at the Royal Institution of Great Britain, a lifetime position.”
    And the guy had a limited education. Geez…..didn’t go to college, didn’t know math or anything man…..natural genius type…..balloons…child’s play.
    Oh, that’s right, I’m leaving a comment. Liked this contest post. It is always a comfort to read another clark’s writing. Don’t have to ponder anything too long, implication(s) automatically register in my frontal lobe. As it would with any clark.
    Having said that, perhaps you would care to comment further on the “eyes/ears closed thing?

    GirlieOnTheEdge

    April 16, 2012 at 4:42 pm

  5. […] Clark: while, ‘a dead balloon is a dead balloon’ the quality that gives life to the (non-dead) balloons… […]

  6. […] while, ‘a dead balloon is a dead balloon’ the quality that gives life to the (non-dead) balloons… (wakefielddoctrine.com) […]

  7. […] while, ‘a dead balloon is a dead balloon’ the quality that gives life to the (non-dead) balloons… (wakefielddoctrine.com) […]

  8. “A ‘dead balloon’ is to a ‘live ballon’ as clarks are to scotts and rogers.” and this my friend is the crux. As you say, only a Clark would understand the banality of that statement. A Roger or Scott would see it as a call for a suicide watch. LOL.

    Jen

    March 30, 2013 at 10:26 am

  9. […] while, ‘a dead balloon is a dead balloon’ the quality that gives life to the (non-dead) balloons… (wakefielddoctrine.com) […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: