the Wakefield Doctrine

the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers

the Wakefield Doctrine (…tap…tap…is this thing on?…tap..tap)

with 8 comments

…”But we need to begin to understand that the Wakefield Doctrine aka the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers is very much a tool that we can use on ourselve…so stay tuned”

Glad you could make it back, lots to talk about.  We will continue presenting the basic concepts of the Doctrine with each Post for the new Reader, but going forward there will be more of the ‘practical side’ of this thing of ours presented and you will see an interes…

…He is going to go on a bit now…Janie here…Sullivan!  How many other fictional constructs who write in blue font and block quotes do you know?  Anyway, what our Writer is going to say is that the CSR 101 series is going to continue to be used as a teaching device…
Hey, it’s their blog, I guess that’s what gives them the right…not I think its kinda cute…they all are taken with the students at Millard Fillmore High.  No, I do not think its confusing or distracting…and there is information in each of their little episodes.
Next one?  Glad you asked…the next Post should be another CSR 101 story about those two scottian teachers/lecturers…Glen Milner and a Miss Ack… I think…no! lol thats not nice!…  they meant well and were very informed…he was not hitting on me!  I mean I heard he went to Fillmore when my uncle was here. 
 (Sigh)  I know, but being a fictional construct has its limitations…
Anyway, that’s not why I am sneaking this in…I made a Comment on Mel’s blog…the Spatula…really?  you should… a lot of fun…anyway Mel has this Walrus character watching the site stats, so as one construct to another, I wrote something nice.  But in his answer he said something about not being comfortable writing Post Comments!
You could have knocked me over with a…then I realised the only Comments we get here are from the ‘Regulars’. 
Hey!  Readers!  all these ‘people’ work real hard on this site, so I want you to listen to me…Write…A…Comment..
If not for them, then for me ;P…you know one imaginary being to another (lol)…really…I would def appreciate it…no, doesn’t have to be about the Doctrine…just a: “I love the blog, keep up the good work…give Janie more dialogue”…(lol)  gotta go, there is a certain substitute teacher who seems to have it in for me…jeez lady, get a life huh?
(Don’t forget: Comment).

So in the coming weeks look for more stories using the CSR 101 premise as well as straight-forward ‘This is the Wakefield Doctrine’ kind of Posts.  We will try to mix it up and keep it interesting.

On a more serious note, you have noticed there have been no Posts from the Progenitor roger recently.  He had a death in the family, our sympathy to the family and we wait for his return.  Fortunately for us, his story line (CSR 101) has started to get a life of its own, we hope he reads all the recent Posts so he can stay current!  Speaking of CSR 101, the next Post should be an ‘interview’ type Post with Glenn and Ms AKH from recent entries.  As I hopefully am not repeating too much, this will be an opportunity to present the Doctrine in a context that should offer entertainment and education.

Speaking of education…did you know the primary identifiers of the clarklike female are: shoes, eyes and head?  We have mentioned her recently, but Flo (of the Progressive Insurance TV ads) has taken over the crown, (and yes, a clarklike female would wear a crown to work if she had one), from Diane Keaton as representative of her kind.  There is a video clip of Ms. Keaton accepting an award somewhere in the clark Page.  Such a clark…not only the clothes but also how she takes being self-effacing to a totally new level.  You should go and look at the…hell here is the link… go on, I’ll wait here.  Alright, tell me you do not know someone like her. Granted clarks have a way of blending into the scenery, sort of…I mean really, wearing three different hats, combat boots, 5 scarves and a shawl and still coming across as sexy, not really blending in, is she?
You clarks out there, you know what I mean.  You are shy and you are introverts but you will still insist on doing the things that make you noticeable.  Remind me to lecture on the ‘blue monkey effect’ when we have the time.

So, look for the (continuing) adventures of our two intrepid scottian Commentators, Glenn and AKH. (That they are scotts and are playing lead in these ‘episodes’, what a surprise.)
Speaking of scottian females, big shoutout to future Friend of the Doctrine, Ms. P. Wood.  Thanks for your help.  As a trade off on making a written Comment here, if you could add the web address( www.wakefielddoctrine.com) to the new sign you made for the Learning Center, we will call it ‘even’?  Either way, no pressure here.
As we say at the Wakefield Doctrine:  read, learn, buy a hat…now to find that video custodian…where did that scamp get off to…”Mr. B!  Mr.B? you’re not off somewhere practicing that hyperthyroid fiddle again, are you?”

remember…write something…I don’t know! you are the real people…how about “Keep bringing that young Janie Sullivan person back, she is such a delight“…sure write that…that’ll keep you up at night  (lol)  as what’s his name says,  ‘don’t worry about nothin”..
‘ta

There you are!  Mr. B, I hope you have something clever for us or at very  least germane to this Post.  You haven’t read it?  If you were not an un-resolved emotional component from the distant past you would be on the employment line faster than you can say, ‘Where is Mr. Chips’.

??! Hey, Don’t look at me! (lmao) I just hit the keys on the keyboard. Think about how (surprised”) I am when these Posts are finished.

Advertisements

Written by clarkscottroger

February 16, 2010 at 8:55 am

8 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Ah yes, “Simply Irresitible.” One of the songs in a compilation tape made for me by a former lover years ago. Excellent song if I do say so myself. Afterall, it was about me.

    AKH

    February 16, 2010 at 11:09 am

  2. As we have done in the past…when a Comment/Reply is of a quality that comprises a benefit to us here at the Doctrine…I will exert editorial privilage and move a Comment from it’s original spot to this most prominant of spots…at the bottom of the current Post.
    I do this is as much in recognition that many first time Visitors (not to mention a couple of Downsprings) might not get into the “Pages” sections of the Wakefield Doctrine.

    So this: Comment from Pixie which was originally written as a Reply on the ‘you might be a clark/scott/roger…’ Page. The Comment is still there and now it is here…
    Thanks Pixie

    Pixie said

    February 16, 2010 at 5:15 pm e

    If you love Christmas lawn decorations and cannot imagine having too many lights… you might be a scott….. OK so I had the electrician come out and put in a separate box for the outdoor Christmas decorations with its very own switch on the wall in the laundry room….so that my roger hubby could decorate the house like the one in “Christmas Vacation”!!!! Btw Clarkey you were so right about him…he is DEF a roger! I hooked him up with your link so he can introduce you in his business class tonight if they have time….

    Reply

    clarkscottroger

    February 16, 2010 at 7:13 pm

    • Welcome to the doctrine, Pixie. A fresh voice is always good. I once had a dog named Pixie. I loved her. She died.

      Glenn

      February 17, 2010 at 11:05 am

    • Welcome to the doctrine Pixie.
      I agree that when the decorations become a pageant, they become Rogerian.
      By the way, we used to have a female friend that called Clark – Clarkey, a much loved scott

      phyllis

      February 17, 2010 at 2:16 pm

    • Hey in dogs years I’m dead!

      Pixie

      February 18, 2010 at 3:47 am

  3. Glenn, Glenn. Now that you have a new friend to play with (the Pixster), I expect to hear more often from you.
    Since you are so conversant in the Wakefield Doctrine, it would be remiss of you not to share your invaluable insights.

    Downspring #1

    February 18, 2010 at 10:04 am

  4. Welcome to the party Pixie:)

    AKH

    February 18, 2010 at 8:18 pm

  5. “the Wakefield Doctrine (…tap…tap…is this thing on?

    …tap..tap) the Wakefield Doctrine” was indeed in fact enjoyable and helpful!
    In modern universe that’s very difficult to achieve.
    Thx, Astrid


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: